← Diligence index  ·  View raw .md

Title: Intended Use Statement — Genomics Compute Layer Version: 0.2.0-draft Status: Draft (§1.3 v5.0q exclusion BED published) Owner: Head of Quality / Regulatory Last Reviewed: 2026-05-06 Next Review: 2026-08-06

Intended Use Statement

This document is the locked intended-use statement for the {{COMPANY_NAME}} genomics compute layer (the "Platform"). The intended-use statement is the load-bearing boundary that keeps the Platform out of the FDA Software-as-a-Medical-Device (SaMD) regulatory path and out of the direct CLIA/CAP scope. Every other document in this dossier, every customer-facing communication, and every product feature must respect this boundary.

If a proposed feature, claim, or contract term would violate this statement, it must be escalated through the change-control SOP before implementation, marketing, or customer commitment.

1. Scope

1.1 In Scope

The Platform performs secondary bioinformatics analysis on de-identified or pseudonymous sequencing data submitted by the customer laboratory. Specifically, the Platform:

1.2 Out of Scope (Explicit)

The Platform does not perform, and the {{COMPANY_NAME}} service offering does not include, any of the following:

The Platform is not a medical device, not a SaMD, not a clinical laboratory, and not an LDT. {{COMPANY_NAME}} does not hold a CLIA certificate and does not seek CAP accreditation under this product scope.

1.3 Reportable-Range Exclusions

The Platform makes no quality claim for the following regions or variant classes. Customers must explicitly exclude these from their internal reportable range, or independently validate them, before using the Platform output for any reportable result.

Exclusion Reason Tracking
GIAB v5.0q HG002 30x exclusion BED (investigations/v5_0q_excluded_regions.bed, SHA-256 (uncompressed) 7dc4d16b1d0eb1d171713bc272c9a3f3b881dddb1f305faba02dac25a3932c1c, 4,571,604 intervals, 747,356,696 bp; post-MHC-lift per ADR-0006). Specifically: GIAB v3.6 alldifficultregions minus MHC ∪ chrX_nonPAR ∪ chrX_XTR ∪ chrX_ampliconic ∪ chrY_nonPAR ∪ chrY_XTR ∪ chrY_ampliconic. PAR regions remain in scope; the MHC / HLA region (chr6:28,510,020-33,480,577) is in scope per ADR-0006. Per-stratum decomposition (V5_0Q_GAP_ANALYSIS.md §5.10) shows that 97.3 % of the 121,994 v5.0q FNs (118,748) lie inside this BED after MHC lift. The in-scope complement (notinalldifficultregions ∪ MHC ∩ chr1-22 ∪ PAR) operates at SNP F1 = 0.9993 and Indel F1 = 0.9959 on HG002 30x (arithmetic estimate per ADR-0006; hap.py confirmation pending), exceeding the v4.2.1 aggregate F1 of 0.9954. v5.0q's assembly-based extension goes almost entirely into difficult-region territory; this is a denominator change by NIST, not a platform regression. investigations/V5_0Q_GAP_ANALYSIS.md §5.10, §6; decisions/0006-mhc-exclusion-lift.md; investigations/v5_0q_excluded_regions.bed
HaplotypeCaller-derived outputs The current HaplotypeCaller benchmark output is empirically invalid (Precision = NaN, Sensitivity = 0.0000 in both v4.2.1 and v5.0q runs surveyed). HaplotypeCaller is excised from the locked pipeline; HaplotypeCaller results must not be used as a quality basis until the benchmark is fixed and HaplotypeCaller is reintroduced through change control. investigations/HAPLOTYPECALLER_BENCHMARK_FIX.md; technical/PIPELINE_LOCK.md §10b
Difficult-to-map regions (segmental duplications, centromeres, telomeres, decoy / alt contigs) Standard short-read limitation; not a Platform-specific claim. GIAB v3.6 stratifications (genome-stratifications-GRCh38@all.tar.gz, MD5 f6b0666987b01aec08e9f5fa17707b10, SHA-256 c5a1eceac54aac2c438af21825223d2a71e64b3db6b1c9e923849babb38063d8). Specific BEDs: Union/GRCh38_alldifficultregions.bed.gz, SegmentalDuplications/GRCh38_segdups.bed.gz, OtherDifficult/GRCh38_MHC.bed.gz, Mappability/GRCh38_lowmappabilityall.bed.gz. Operationalized as the exclusion BED at investigations/v5_0q_excluded_regions.bed for the v5.0q evaluation.
Structural variants > 50 bp DeepVariant short-variant caller is not validated for SV. SV is out of scope until a separate validation is performed. validation/ (separate bundle)
Copy-number variation CNV is out of scope of this product; not produced by the pipeline. n/a
Mitochondrial variants [TBD] <!-- DOMAIN-INPUT-NEEDED: confirm whether MT contig is included in default reference and called; if included, whether heteroplasmy is reported. Typical decision: MT excluded from clinical claims unless explicitly validated. --> n/a
Sex chromosomes: chrX_nonPAR, chrX_XTR, chrX_ampliconic, chrY_nonPAR, chrY_XTR, chrY_ampliconic. PAR is in scope (autosomal-equivalent, diploid genotypes). Sex-chromosome non-PAR/XTR/ampliconic content is excluded (when sex is declared) per GIAB v3.6 XY stratifications; caller behavior on sex chromosomes outside PAR depends on ploidy hint and is not validated as a clinical claim. investigations/v5_0q_excluded_regions.bed (incorporates the chrX/Y XY strata listed); GIAB v3.6 XY/GRCh38_chr{X,Y}_{nonPAR,XTR,ampliconic}.bed.gz.
Any non-GRCh38 reference build Validation evidence is on GRCh38 only; T2T-CHM13 and GRCh37 are out of scope. n/a
Inputs below the supported QC floor (read length, coverage, quality) Listed in technical/PIPELINE_LOCK.md; out-of-spec inputs return WARN/FAIL QC and no quality claim is made. [TBD] <!-- DOMAIN-INPUT-NEEDED: minimum supported read length (typical 150 bp PE), minimum mean coverage for WGS (typical 30x), minimum mean target coverage for WES (typical 100x) -->

1.4 Required Per-Run QC and Provenance

Every successful job produces, at minimum:

Reason codes, thresholds, and the PASS/WARN/FAIL decision logic are defined in technical/QC_SPEC.md.

2. Intended Users

The Platform is intended to be used only by trained personnel acting on behalf of a CLIA-certified (and, where applicable, CAP-accredited) clinical laboratory. Specifically:

The Platform is not intended for use by:

3. Intended Environment

The Platform is intended to be operated in support of a customer-validated CLIA / CAP laboratory environment. Specifically:

The Platform itself runs on:

GPU compute capability requirements and the supported host configuration list are pinned in technical/PIPELINE_LOCK.md.

4. Required Disclaimers

Every customer-facing artifact, manifest, API response, and customer-facing document must carry the following disclaimer (or the version then-current in intended-use/INTENDED_USE.md and intended-use/QUALITY_CLAIMS.md — a dedicated customer/DISCLAIMERS.md is not maintained; the language below is the authoritative customer-facing disclaimer):

The {{COMPANY_NAME}} genomics compute layer is a secondary-analysis compute and artifact-delivery service. It is not a medical device, not a clinical laboratory, and not a clinical interpretation service. Outputs are not clinical results. The customer laboratory is solely responsible for assay validation, reportable-range definition, clinical interpretation, and report sign-out under its own CLIA certificate and (where applicable) CAP accreditation.

The disclaimer must be visible in:

5. Phased Commercial Path Alignment

This intended-use statement applies to all four phases of the commercial path. It does not change between Phase 1 (paid validation pilot), Phase 2 (parallel production comparison), Phase 3 (lab internal sign-off), and Phase 4 (paid per-test clinical production compute). The Platform's boundary is the same in all phases. What changes between phases is the customer's confidence in the Platform's output, not {{COMPANY_NAME}}'s regulatory posture.

In particular: Phase 4 production compute does not make {{COMPANY_NAME}} a clinical laboratory. The customer is the lab of record in Phase 4 exactly as in Phase 1.

6. Change Control

Any change to this document — including any addition to §1.1 (In Scope), any removal from §1.2 (Out of Scope), any narrowing of §1.3 (Reportable- Range Exclusions), any change to §2 (Intended Users), §3 (Intended Environment), or §4 (Required Disclaimers) — is a regulated change.

Required process:

  1. Open a change request referencing this document and version.
  2. Document the proposed change, the business reason, the regulatory analysis (does it move the product toward SaMD scope? toward LDT scope? toward HIPAA covered-entity scope?), and the validation impact.
  3. Obtain written sign-off from the Owner listed in the front matter and from a second reviewer from Quality / Regulatory.
  4. Bump this document's Version, set Status to In Review, and route for sign-off per sops/CHANGE_CONTROL.md.
  5. On approval, mark Status: Approved, increment Last Reviewed, and archive the prior version under Status: Superseded for audit history.

A change to this document may trigger a revalidation of the pipeline (see technical/PIPELINE_LOCK.md revalidation triggers) and may trigger an update to the customer agreement template (see compliance/DPA_TEMPLATE.md; a dedicated customer/PILOT_AGREEMENT.md [TBD] ).

7. Open Issues That Constrain This Statement

These issues are tracked in the investigations/ bundle and are restated here because they directly constrain what the Platform may claim: